Ha-ha...Thanks Cheri as always for bringing your warm comments to my blog. Man...my makeup game has improved lot thanks goodness. Now I really want to focus on my eye area when I get a chance.

As for missing out on my blog, I understand since you didn't have any hair O_O. Do you still rock that? Just an FYI to your question, you can't grow two feet of hair overnight...did you even want that question answered lol ^_-.

Until next time Cheri and have a blessed day

Yep still rockin it short! I'm lazy ... well lets just say a low maintenance girl! Sounds better that way! ;) Yes the question was rhetorical ... now what does rhetorical mean? o_O Ha Ha

And I'm Serious about 5yrs of blogging! That's quite a Accomplishment! You and the blog have grown much! Meant as a Huge Compliment! :)

O_O based on google definition it means "(of a question) asked in order to produce an effect or to make a statement rather than to elicit information." haha...LOL.

Until next time Cheri <3

LMBO Okay you got me ... was cutting up and you just had to BUS me ... silly gurl! :)

Puleeze no reply necessary ... you'll have me reading the entire dictionary followed up with a dang Q&A session if I ain't careful o_O LOL

Later Sis aka Professor K =D

Thanks Benita :)

I can see why they advocated larger locks because smaller Sisterlocks does require so much work and to tell you the truth, majority of the ladies will not and can't handle that. As for thinner hair, it all depends on what look you going for. If you go bigger, I think the thinnest of your hair is more apparent vs. growing smaller. If you want fullness, you should go with the standard small "safest" Sisterlocks.

Smaller Sisterlocks required a strong commitment. You just can't go longer then 4-6 week on smaller Sisterlocks because you will not have enough hair strands to support the locks. I myself (speaking from personally experience) see what can happen when the new growth can be too much, and I can see how I can pop a couple of strand of my hair, and by doing that alone, my locks can start to get thinner and offer less support for the whole lock.

As for your hair ripping, the only way that can happen is by simply having a lock that is too thick for the root (new growth). That is why I will always recommend to go a little bit smaller then what you are comfortable with, and just be careful with the request of large locks, because you can always merge smaller ones if you find after they mature they are too small, but splitting a large lock is bothersome and can introduce damage to the locks itself.

I follow one person that has thin hair and has Sisterlocks, and her locks seem to follow the standard size Sisterlocks guideline. I also find that my consultant also sticks to Sisterlocks guidelines to this very day, and she has YEARS of experiences. So if I were to become a consultant, I would stick with the guideline myself. I would rather turn away someone that doesn't fully understand what getting Sisterlocks entail, then put big locks that doesn’t even resemble what they are paying for, which is Sisterlocks.

Yeah 5 years! I get "I don't think I could handle it" a lot. It is a huge comment for real to have them that small. You can have them bigger by the way. Thanks again for the comment :)

Thanks so much :D. I too can't believe how time fly. I so remember when I was just wishing for length. Now it is going with the flow because the length is workable now.

Thanks Cheleski :)